Atheist's Wager
| Part of a series on |
| Atheism |
|---|
|
Arguments for atheism |
|
The Atheist's Wager, formulated by the philosopher Michael Martin and published in his 1990 book Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, is an atheistic response to Pascal's Wager regarding the existence of God.
One version of the Atheist's Wager suggests that since a kind and loving god would reward good deeds – and that if no gods exist, good deeds would still leave a positive legacy – one should live a good life without religion.[1][2] Another formulation suggests that a god may reward honest disbelief, a reward which would then be jeopardized by a dishonest belief in the divine.[3]
Explanation
The Wager states that if one were to analyze their options in regard to how to live their life, he or she would arrive at the following possibilities:[1][4][5]
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
The following table shows the values assigned to each possible outcome:
| Belief in god (B) | No belief in god (¬B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Good life (L) | +∞ (heaven) | +∞ (heaven) |
| Evil life (¬L) | -∞ (hell) | -∞ (hell) |
| Belief in god (B) | No belief in god (¬B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Good life (L) | +X (positive legacy) | +X (positive legacy) |
| Evil life (¬L) | -X (negative legacy) | -X (negative legacy) |
Given these values, Martin argues that the option to live a good life clearly dominates the option of living an evil life, regardless of belief in a god.
References
- 1 2 Martin, Michael (1990). Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Temple University Press. pp. 232–238.
- ↑ Alvin F Berry. So What If...the God of the Bible Exists...Does It Really Matter at the End ... Dog Ear Publishing. p. 10. ISBN 9781457500206. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
- ↑ Philip A Stahl. Atheism: A Beginner's Handbook: All You Wanted to Know About Atheism and Why. ISBN 9780595427376.
- ↑ "The Atheists Wager". Retrieved 26 January 2013.
- ↑ Pascal's Wager as an Argument for Not Believing in God. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
| Concepts in religion | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptions of God |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Existence of God |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Theology |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Religious language | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Problem of evil | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Philosophers of religion (by date active) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
