List of Big East Conference (1979–2013) football standings

This is a list of yearly Big East Conference (1979–2013) football standings.

Big East standings

1991 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team W   L   T     W   L   T
#11 Syracuse 5 – 0 – 0     10 – 2 – 0
#1 Miami (FL) 2 – 0 – 0     12 – 0 – 0
Virginia Tech 1 – 0 – 0     5 – 6 – 0
Pittsburgh 3 – 2 – 0     6 – 5 – 0
West Virginia 3 – 4 – 0     6 – 5 – 0
Rutgers 2 – 3 – 0     6 – 5 – 0
Boston College 2 – 4 – 0     4 – 7 – 0
Temple 0 – 5 – 0     2 – 9 – 0
  • The Big East did not crown an official champion until 1993 when full league play began.
Rankings from AP Poll
1992 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team W   L   T     W   L   T
#3 Miami (FL) 4 – 0 – 0     11 – 1 – 0
#6 Syracuse 6 – 1 – 0     10 – 2 – 0
Rutgers 4 – 2 – 0     7 – 4 – 0
#21 Boston College 2 – 1 – 1     8 – 3 – 1
West Virginia 2 – 3 – 1     5 – 4 – 2
Pittsburgh 1 – 3 – 0     3 – 9 – 0
Virginia Tech 1 – 4 – 0     2 – 8 – 1
Temple 0 – 6 – 0     1 – 10 – 0
  • The Big East did not crown an official champion until 1993 when full league play began.
Rankings from AP Poll
1993 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team W   L   T     W   L   T
#7 West Virginia $ 7 – 0 – 0     11 – 1 – 0
#15 Miami (FL) 6 – 1 – 0     9 – 3 – 0
#13 Boston College 5 – 2 – 0     9 – 3 – 0
#22 Virginia Tech 4 – 3 – 0     9 – 3 – 0
Syracuse 3 – 4 – 0     6 – 4 – 1
Pittsburgh 2 – 5 – 0     3 – 8 – 0
Rutgers 1 – 6 – 0     4 – 7 – 0
Temple 0 – 7 – 0     1 – 10 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1994 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team W   L   T     W   L   T
#6 Miami (FL) $ 7 – 0 – 0     10 – 2 – 0
Virginia Tech 5 – 2 – 0     8 – 4 – 0
Syracuse 4 – 3 – 0     7 – 4 – 0
West Virginia 4 – 3 – 0     7 – 6 – 0
#23 Boston College 3 – 3 – 1     7 – 4 – 1
Rutgers 2 – 4 – 1     5 – 5 – 1
Pittsburgh 2 – 5 – 0     3 – 8 – 0
Temple 0 – 7 – 0     2 – 9 – 0
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1995 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#10 Virginia Tech +   6 – 1         10 – 2  
#20 Miami (FL) +   6 – 1         8 – 3  
#19 Syracuse   5 – 2         9 – 3  
West Virginia   4 – 3         5 – 6  
Boston College   4 – 3         4 – 8  
Rutgers   2 – 5         4 – 7  
Temple   1 – 6         1 – 10  
Pittsburgh   0 – 7         2 – 9  
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
1996 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#13 Virginia Tech +   6 – 1         10 – 2  
#14 Miami (FL) +   6 – 1         9 – 3  
#21 Syracuse +   6 – 1         9 – 3  
West Virginia   4 – 3         8 – 4  
Pittsburgh   3 – 4         4 – 7  
Boston College   2 – 5         5 – 7  
Rutgers   1 – 6         2 – 9  
Temple   0 – 7         1 – 10  
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
1997 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#21 Syracuse $   6 – 1         9 – 4  
#23 Virginia Tech   5 – 2         7 – 5  
West Virginia   4 – 3         7 – 5  
Pittsburgh   4 – 3         6 – 6  
Miami (FL)   3 – 4         5 – 6  
Boston College   3 – 4         4 – 7  
Temple   3 – 4         4 – 8  
Rutgers   0 – 7         0 – 11  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1998 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#25 Syracuse $   6 – 1         8 – 4  
#20 Miami (FL)   5 – 2         9 – 3  
#23 Virginia Tech   5 – 2         9 – 3  
West Virginia   5 – 2         8 – 4  
Boston College   3 – 4         4 – 7  
Rutgers   2 – 5         5 – 6  
Temple   2 – 5         2 – 9  
Pittsburgh   0 – 7         2 – 9  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1999 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#2 Virginia Tech $   7 – 0         11 – 1  
#15 Miami (FL)   6 – 1         9 – 4  
Boston College   4 – 3         8 – 4  
Syracuse   3 – 4         7 – 5  
West Virginia   3 – 4         4 – 7  
Pittsburgh   2 – 5         5 – 6  
Temple   2 – 5         2 – 9  
Rutgers   1 – 6         1 – 10  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2000 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#2 Miami (FL) $   7 – 0         11 – 1  
#6 Virginia Tech   6 – 1         11 – 1  
Pittsburgh   4 – 3         7 – 5  
Syracuse   4 – 3         6 – 5  
Boston College   3 – 4         7 – 5  
West Virginia   3 – 4         7 – 5  
Temple   1 – 6         4 – 7  
Rutgers   0 – 7         3 – 8  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2001 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#1 Miami (FL) $#   7 – 0         12 – 0  
#14 Syracuse   6 – 1         10 – 3  
#21 Boston College   4 – 3         8 – 4  
#18 Virginia Tech   4 – 3         8 – 4  
Pittsburgh   4 – 3         7 – 5  
Temple   2 – 5         4 – 7  
West Virginia   1 – 6         3 – 8  
Rutgers   0 – 7         2 – 9  
  • # – BCS National Champion
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2002 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#2 Miami (FL) $   7 – 0         12 – 1  
#25 West Virginia   6 – 1         9 – 4  
#19 Pittsburgh   5 – 2         9 – 4  
#18 Virginia Tech   3 – 4         10 – 4  
Boston College   3 – 4         9 – 4  
Syracuse   2 – 5         4 – 8  
Temple   2 – 5         4 – 8  
Rutgers   0 – 7         1 – 11  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2003 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#5 Miami (FL) $+   6 – 1         11 – 2  
West Virginia +   6 – 1         8 – 5  
Pittsburgh   5 – 2         8 – 5  
Virginia Tech   4 – 3         8 – 5  
Boston College   3 – 4         8 – 5  
Syracuse   2 – 5         6 – 6  
Rutgers   2 – 5         5 – 7  
Temple   0 – 7         1 – 11  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#25 Pittsburgh $+   4 – 2         8 – 4  
#21 Boston College +   4 – 2         9 – 3  
West Virginia +   4 – 2         8 – 4  
Syracuse +   4 – 2         6 – 6  
Connecticut   3 – 3         8 – 4  
Rutgers   1 – 5         4 – 7  
Temple   1 – 5         2 – 9  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2005 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#5 West Virginia $   7 – 0         11 – 1  
#19 Louisville   5 – 2         9 – 3  
Rutgers   4 – 3         7 – 5  
South Florida   4 – 3         6 – 6  
Pittsburgh   4 – 3         5 – 6  
Connecticut   2 – 5         5 – 6  
Cincinnati   2 – 5         4 – 7  
Syracuse   0 – 7         1 – 10  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2006 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#6 Louisville $   6 – 1         12 – 1  
#10 West Virginia   5 – 2         11 – 2  
#12 Rutgers   5 – 2         11 – 2  
South Florida   4 – 3         9 – 4  
Cincinnati   4 – 3         8 – 5  
Pittsburgh   2 – 5         6 – 6  
Connecticut   1 – 6         4 – 8  
Syracuse   0 – 6         0 – 8  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2007 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#6 West Virginia $+   5 – 2         11 – 2  
Connecticut +   5 – 2         9 – 4  
#17 Cincinnati   4 – 3         10 – 3  
South Florida   4 – 3         9 – 4  
Rutgers   3 – 4         8 – 5  
Louisville   3 – 4         6 – 6  
Pittsburgh   3 – 4         5 – 7  
Syracuse   1 – 6         2 – 10  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2008 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#17 Cincinnati $   6 – 1         11 – 3  
Pittsburgh   5 – 2         9 – 4  
#23 West Virginia   5 – 2         9 – 4  
Rutgers   5 – 2         8 – 5  
Connecticut   3 – 4         8 – 5  
South Florida   2 – 5         8 – 5  
Louisville   1 – 6         5 – 7  
Syracuse   1 – 6         3 – 9  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2009 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#8 Cincinnati $   7 – 0         12 – 1  
#25 West Virginia   5 – 2         9 – 4  
#15 Pittsburgh   5 – 2         10 – 3  
Rutgers   3 – 4         9 – 4  
Connecticut   3 – 4         8 – 5  
South Florida   3 – 4         8 – 5  
Louisville   1 – 6         4 – 8  
Syracuse   1 – 6         4 – 8  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2010 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
Connecticut $+   5 – 2         8 – 5  
West Virginia +   5 – 2         9 – 4  
Pittsburgh +   5 – 2         8 – 5  
Syracuse   4 – 3         8 – 5  
South Florida   3 – 4         8 – 5  
Louisville   3 – 4         7 – 6  
Cincinnati   2 – 5         4 – 8  
Rutgers   1 – 6         4 – 8  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
As of January 11, 2011; Rankings from AP Poll
2011 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#17 West Virginia $+   5 – 2         10 – 3  
#25 Cincinnati +   5 – 2         10 – 3  
Louisville +   5 – 2         7 – 6  
Rutgers   4 – 3         9 – 4  
Pittsburgh   4 – 3         6 – 7  
Connecticut   3 – 4         5 – 7  
South Florida   1 – 6         5 – 7  
Syracuse   1 – 6         5 – 7  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
As of January 11, 2012; Rankings from AP Poll
2012 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#13 Louisville $+   5 – 2         11 – 2  
Cincinnati +   5 – 2         10 – 3  
Rutgers +   5 – 2         9 – 4  
Syracuse +   5 – 2         8 – 5  
Pittsburgh   3 – 4         6 – 7  
Connecticut   2 – 5         5 – 7  
Temple   2 – 5         4 – 7  
South Florida   1 – 6         3 – 9  
  • $ – BCS representative as conference champion
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll

References


    This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/27/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.